Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madras High Court10386
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2929
+ Bombay High Court2790
+ Central Information Commission1375
+ Kerala High Court1222
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1063
+ CESTAT1002
+ Central Administrative Tribunal992
+ Delhi High Court916
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission911
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission849
+ National Green Tribunal541
+ Supreme Court Of India510
+ Patna High Court498
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court463
+ Allahabad High Court440
+ SEBI402
+ Gujarat High Court389
+ Karnataka High Court387
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court373
+ Calcutta High Court305
+ Gauhati High Court279
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court269
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission227
+ Rajasthan High Court206
+ Telangana High Court201
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court198
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal170
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity148
+ Chhattisgarh High Court121
+ Uttarakhand High Court115
+ Jharkhand High Court107
+ National Company Law Tribunal79
+ Orissa High Court71
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal65
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court64
+ Company Law Board63
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST46
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act45
+ Tripura High Court45
+ Armed Forces Tribunal43
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal38
+ RERA38
+ Sikkim High Court30
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal26
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal24
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India21
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange21
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board20
+ Manipur High Court17
+ Competition Commission Of India16
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal15
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction12
+ Commissioner (Appeals)11
+ Privy Council10
+ Meghalaya High Court8
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST7
+ District Court5
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority5
+ Settlement Commission4
+ Authority For Advance Rulings2
+ AAR-GST1
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan1
+ Copyright Board1
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India1
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards15028
From 2011 To 202011440
From 2001 To 20102700
From 1991 To 20005
From 1981 To 19901
From 1971 To 19806
From 1961 To 19701
From 1951 To 19605
Before 19501

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 ...overruled. In Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600 this Court held as follows:“150...law on admissibility of secondary evidence pertaining to electronic record, as stated by this Court in Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600, does...

...(2005) 11 SCC 600, making exhaustive reference to several decisions on the point, including ...(2005) 11 SCC 600)“97. Mostly, conspiraci...Bombay in Criminal Revision Application No. 288 of 2005 and in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1884 of 2006 respectively. By the first order, the High Court has repelled the challenge made to order dated...

...(2005) 11 SCC 600.24. We may, however, also refer to the judgment of this Court in...(2005) 11 SCC 600 that secondary evidence of electronic record could be covered under Sections 63 and 65 of the Evidence Act, was not correct. There a...23-11-2017, as prayed.———(2018) 2 SCC 807Order dated 30-1-2018...

...(2005) 11 SCC 600.”4. On the issue of interpretation of Section 65-B(4) of the Evidence Act, 1872 with regard ..., (2005) 11 SCC 600. By the videography, crucial evidence can be captured and presented in a credible manner..... We may note the proceedings in the case on earlier hearings. In order dated 25-4-2017 (2018) 2 SCC 801, (2018) 2 SCC...

...(2005) 11 SCC 600, AIR 2005 SC 3820, this Court held...) 11 SCC 600, AIR 2005 SC 3820.30. The Hon'ble Apex Court, after considering the...facts of the case, in a nutshell held that: (Navjot Sandhu case (2005) 11 SCC ...

.... In State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600 (vide this...Supp (1) SCC 80, AIR 1994 SC 2420.11. Learned counsel for the respondent relied upon a decision of this Court in...Chonampara Chellappan v. State Of Kerala . (1979) 4 SCC 312...

...(2005) 11 SCC 600 a two-Judge Bench of this Court had an occasion to consider an issue on production of electronic record as evidence. While considering the printouts of the computerised records of...-A and 65-B. To that extent, the statement of law on admissibility of secondary evidence pertaining to electronic record, as stated by this Court in Navjot Sandhu case (2005) 11 SCC 600, does not lay...deal in proving the guilt of the accused. Similarly, in State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600, the links between the...

...(2005) 11 SCC 600 , ...(2005) 11 SCC 600 , ...Mehboob Ali v. State of Rajasthan 2009 SCC OnLine Raj 2693 and other connected matters...

...Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600, the links between the slain terrorists and the masterminds of the attack were established...(2011) 11 SCC 766 : (2011) 3 SCC (Cri) .... (2011) 11 SCC 766 wherein it was observed as under:52. “We may at the threshold say that a finding of fact concurrently recorded...

...State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600 (commonly known as.... (2005) 11 SCC 600 wherein a comparison has been made between “confession” and “retracted confession”. While in the former case, it was observed t...contraband opium was found and on measurement the bags were found to contain the following amounts of opium:(i) Bag ‘A’ 11 kg 500 gm (ii...

...(2005) 11 SCC 600 the conclusion of the Full Bench cannot be sustained. He also submitted that in view of the same, the consequential direction to the ...Sandhu case (2005) 11 SCC 600. The relevant portions of the judgment read as under:“Law regarding...(2005) 11 SCC 600)“84. … In the light of the foregoing discussion, we have no option but to reject t...

...(2005) 11 SCC 600 a two-Judge Bench of this Court had an occasion to consider an issue on production of electronic record as evidence. While considerin...(2005) 11 SCC 600, does not lay down the correct legal position. It requires to be overruled and we do so. An electronic record by way of..., 1951 (hereinafter referred to as “the RP Act”) and also sought for a declaration in favour of the appellant.3. By order dated 16-11-2011, the High Court held that the...

...(2005) 11 SCC 600:“This Court rejected the contention advanced on behalf of the State that the two...(2005) 11 SCC 600 this Court observed:“32. As to what should be the legal approach of the court called upon to convi...(2005) 11 SCC 600 and Sidharth (2005) 12 SCC 545.142. In Sidharth (2005) 12 ...

.... Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600, .... Venkatkrishnan v. Central Bureau Of Investigation . (2009) 11 SCC 737, AIR 2010...below and ocular evidence is corroborated by the medical evidence. Thus, the appeals lack merit and are liable to be dismissed.11. The essential ingredients of criminal...

...State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600, JT...law of conspiracy, with its definition, the essential features and required proof.11. Section 120-A IPC defines “criminal conspiracy”. According to this section when two or...(1999) 5 SCC 253, JT (1999) 4 SC 106 it was observed by S.S.M Quadri, J. at JT para 677...

.... In State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600 this Court...appellant's connection with crime.”(See also Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600 and...(2005) 3 SCC 169 stating:“Under Section 30 of the Evidence Act, the extra-judicial confession made by a co-accused could...

...(2005) 11 SCC 600.]36. In such a fact situation if illegally collected material can be examined by the court of law, w...Dr B.S Chauhan, J.— Both these appeals have been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 11-4-2012 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in.... However, the said order dated 10-10-2011 was quashed by the High Court vide judgment and order dated 11-4-2012 in Umesh Kumar v. State of...

.... Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600 commonly known as the “Parliament attack case”. Therein also this Court held...Regulation Act, 1973 (for short “the Act”) is the question involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 30-11-2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay in FERA...the confession made by him imposed a consolidated penalty of Rs 10 lakhs, stating:“11. I have independently gone through the evidence on record too based on which the...

...State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600 this Court has laid down the...S.B Sinha, J.— The Union of India is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 13-5-2005 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore...to prove its case by examining any independent witness.11. Mr Sushil Kumar, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent 3, on the other hand...

...(2005) 11 SCC 600 has been commended to us.10. Chapter XII of the Code deals with information to the police...understood: (Upkar Singh case (2004) 13 SCC 292)“11. This observation of the Supreme Court in...interim bail in view of the decision rendered by the Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Amarawati v. State of U.P 2005...

x