Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Delhi High Court24
+ Madras High Court20
+ Supreme Court Of India19
+ Bombay High Court15
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court14
+ Calcutta High Court7
+ Karnataka High Court7
+ Kerala High Court7
+ Company Law Board6
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission6
+ Patna High Court6
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court6
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court5
+ Uttarakhand High Court5
+ Orissa High Court4
+ Telangana High Court4
+ Allahabad High Court3
+ CESTAT3
+ Gujarat High Court3
+ Chhattisgarh High Court2
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court2
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal1
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal1
+ Gauhati High Court1
+ Jharkhand High Court1
+ Meghalaya High Court1
+ Rajasthan High Court1
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Administrative Tribunal0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards55
From 2011 To 202065
From 2001 To 201041
From 1991 To 20001
From 1981 To 19900
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

.... (1999) 8 SCC 315 and Hameed Joharan v. Abdul Salam (2001) 7 SCC 573.4. In...Joharan case (2001) 7 SCC 573 it was held after referring to the meaning of the word “enforce” from various dictionaries the words “when the decree or order becomes enforceable” should be read in literal...

...) Hameed Joharan v. Abdul Salam (2001) 7 SCC 573 and was of the view that it would be appropriate that the case be placed before a three-Judge Bench to resolve the confl...a decree passed in a suit for partition, hence the question of engrossing of the decree on stamp paper does not arise.15. In Hameed Joharan case (2001) 7 SCC 573 a...thus stands restricted to the scheme of the Indian Stamp Act.19. As regards the bar under Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, it was held in Hameed Joharan case (2001) 7 SCC...

....15. In Hameed Joharan v. Abdul Salam (2001) 7 SCC 573, Shankar Balwant Lokhande (1995) 3 SCC 413 was distinguished...

...Hameed Joharan (dead) v. Abdul Salam (dead) By LRs 2 the Apex Court to be used Maxims Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt in other words law assist those...

...Court was in error when it reached the conclusion that the execution application was within limitation. In support of his contention he relied upon [Hameed Joharan (Dead) and Ors. v. Abdul.... It is appropriate to refer to Hameed Joharan (supra), first at this stage, therein it is held that Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides that limitation period...

...573, Hameed Joharan (Dead.) v. Abdul Salam (Dead.) by L.Rs, and (2005) 10...argument, he relied upon (2004) 8 SCC 724, Chandi Prasad v. Jagdish Prasad.4. It is appropriate to refer to Hameed Joharan (supra...

...learned counsel for the opposite parties also relied on the case of Hameed Joharan (dead) v. Abdul Salam (dead) by L. Rs...till the date of signing on the stamp papers. In that context their Lordships have interpreted the term “final decree. In that context the Apex Court in the case of Hameed Joharan (supra) referred to...Hameed Joharan (supra) held that limitation is to run from the date of passing order for drawing of the final decree in the stamp papers and not from the date on which the stamp papers are filed...

...HAMEED JOHARAN (D) & OTHERS Vs. ABDUL SALAM (D) BY L.RS. & OTHERS reported in AIR 2001 SC 3404, wherein the Apex Court...

...(1999) 9 SCC 334 and the judgment in Hameed Joharan v. Abdul Salam (2001) 7 SCC 573. It is no doubt true...to similar facts.”70. For the same reason, it is clear that the judgment in Hameed Joharan (2001) 7 SCC 573, which stated that execution and enforcement were...: (Hameed Joharan case (2001) 7 SCC 573)“38.…Absurdity cannot be the outcome of an...

...Hameed Joharan (Dead) v. Abdul Salam (Dead) By L.Rs 2001 7 SCC 573, the Apex Court observed that...

...Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in view of a recent judgment of this Court in Hameed Joharan v. Abdul Salam (2001) 7 SCC 573...to pray for restitution notwithstanding the decision in the case of Hameed Joharan (2001) 7 SCC 573 or that of Prasanna Kumar Roy Karmakar (1996) 3 SCC 403. The fact situation is such that it does...

...limitation. The learned counsel for the petitioners has placed the reliance on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Hameed Joharan v. Abdul...the decree-holder immediately after the said decree……”9. At this juncture, it would be pertinent to mention that in none of the decisions of the Apex Court in the cases of Hameed...Joharan (supra), Ratan Singh (supra) and Dr. Chiranji Lal (supra), as relied by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the issue pertaining to the date of starting point of limitation under...

...Hameed Joharan v. Abdul Salam (2001) 7 SCC 573 whereupon reliance has been placed by the respondents, this Court while interpreting the provisions of Article...

...Hameed Joharan and Ors. v. Abdul Salam and Ors. , where the Court observed: It cannot but be the general policy of our law to use the legal diligence and this has...

... case of Hameed Joharan vs. Abdul Salam; (2001) 7 SCC 573, following pertinent observations have been made...

...Hameed Joharan v. Abdul Salam ((2001) 7 SCC 573...decisions in Shankar Balwant Lokhande, Hameed Joharan as well as in West Bengal Essential Commodities Supply Corporation cases (supra) and various other authorities. The Court, thereafter, held that...

..., 1985 SCC (Tax) 92 and Hameed Joharan v. Abdul Salam (2001) 7 SCC 573...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...Apex Court in Hameed Joharan v. Abdul Salam, (2001) 7 SCC 573 made the following observations:—“……..It cannot but be the...

x