Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ SEBI3
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court2
+ Calcutta High Court1
+ Gujarat High Court1
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal1
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Allahabad High Court0
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Bombay High Court0
+ CESTAT0
+ Central Administrative Tribunal0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Chhattisgarh High Court0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Delhi High Court0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Gauhati High Court0
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Karnataka High Court0
+ Kerala High Court0
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court0
+ Madras High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Patna High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Rajasthan High Court0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Supreme Court Of India0
+ Telangana High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
+ Uttarakhand High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards2
From 2011 To 20202
From 2001 To 20104
From 1991 To 20000
From 1981 To 19900
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19601
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

.../= was paid to the applicant after deducting Rs. 1,99,821/= earlier paid to the applicant. The difference of Rs. 20,173/= and of Rs. 14,110/= has been paid to the applicant.Mr. Mishra has...preferred this Application for review of our common judgment and order dated 15th October 2008 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 1130 of 2008 arising from Special Civil Application No. 3081 of 2008 and...our common judgment and order dated 15 October 2008. The said order is, therefore, required to be reviewed.Mr. Soparkar has appeared for the Opponent-C.S Hotels Private Limited. He has...

...that the claimant-appellant at the time of accident was aged 27 years and was working with M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited and was getting a salary of Rs.20,173/- per month...the income of the claimant-appellant, which was Rs.20,173/- per month. Keeping in view the age of the claimant-appellant, a multiplier of 17 would have to be applied and an addition of 40% would have... FAO No.6232 of 2013 1 2024:PHHC:022744 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH...

...in deleting the penalty levied on disallowance of Rs. 26,613/- made out of telephone expenses and Rs. 20,173/- made out of electricity expenses holding that assessee has not furnished inaccurate...-1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the penalty on deemed dividend of Rs. 5,12,969/- without appreciating the CIT(A)'s order in Quantum Appeal...on this has not accepted by the Revenue and appeal filed, therefore, in terms of proviso to Section 275 inserted w.e.f 01-06-2003, penalty on the said amount was correctly levied.2. On...

...Verma Vs Manav Enterprises and another service center shared an estimate cost of Rs.20,173/- towards repairing the said TV and same was rejected by the complainant. The complainant did not...of Rs.54,000/-. At the time of purchase, Op No.1 assured that the same is best in its class and that there is no such complaint regarding its working and that in case of any complaint regarding the...same, then the same can be repaired/replaced from 2 Raj Kumar Verma Vs Manav Enterprises and another the officials of the OP No.2. It is further...

...final decree, pass a preliminary decree directing such accounts to be taken as thinks fits. During the trial of the case, the petitioners-defendant submitted complete accounts vide Ex.D-1 and Ex.D-2...sufficient to ascertain the amount due to the plaintiff and thereby suit stands decreed impliedly to the extent of passing of preliminary decree and reached to the stage of post preliminary decree though...no such decree has yet been passed. In view of accounts rendered subsequently and emerging circumstances, the respondent-plaintiff moved application for converting the suit for rendition of account...

...states that in the accounting year relative to the assessment year 1947-1948, the assessee received Rs. 4,987/- and in the next accounting year he received Rs. 20,173/-. How these annuities could have...and to Rs. 20,173/- in the accounting year relative to the assessment year 1948-1949?7. Did the assessee complete the period of Agreement by serving for the full period in accordance...instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax and four referred at the instance of the assessee. The original Reference, which is Reference No. 70 of 1951, comprised five questions. The assessee wanted a...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...transactions in a concerted manner in the following 10 scrips to artificially depress the prices of these securities between mid February and mid March in a concerted manner and thereby distorted the...true price discovery process and indulged in market manipulation in these securities:(i) Global Telesystems,(ii) HFCL(iii) DSQ Software(iv....1. That the conduct of the aforesaid entities is unbecoming of stock brokers and sub brokers and that they did not exhibit high standards of integrity, fairness and professionalism of...

...sale positions of 20,173 shares that resulted in delivery. The net sale position is not altered whether there is delivery or not and it is also not correct to state that it is a mere coincidence of...(Under Regulation 29(3) of SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub Brokers) Regulations, 1992 read with Regulation 13 of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to...certain entities to distort the true price discovery and manipulate the securities market. In the light of the above, preliminary investigation were carried out by SEBI to find out the role of various...

...India (Stock Brokers and Sub Brokers) Regulations, 1992 (the Stock Regulations) read with regulation 13 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade...mid March, the context of “apprehensions of possible attempts by certain entities to distort the true discovery and manipulate the securities market” SEBI carried out a preliminary investigation find...(stated in the impugned order) and transactions prima facie appeared, inter alia, to have been carried out to artificially depress prices “of the scrips of the said companies. In that context on...

.... Ltd. Appellant Vs. The Chairman Securities and Exchange Board of India Respondent Appeal No. 55 of 2002 M.../s.Bang Equity Broking Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Vs. The Chairman Securities and Exchange Board of India Respondent Appeal No. 56 of 2002... M/s. Bama Securities Ltd. Appellant Vs. The Chairman Securities and Exchange Board of India Respondent Appeal No...