Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission142472
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal80563
+ Karnataka High Court39687
+ Kerala High Court39401
+ Madras High Court39069
+ Bombay High Court37468
+ Telangana High Court35681
+ Central Administrative Tribunal35601
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission35165
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal31363
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court29595
+ Central Information Commission27073
+ Delhi High Court20005
+ Gujarat High Court19215
+ CESTAT16588
+ National Company Law Tribunal14555
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court12672
+ Allahabad High Court12333
+ RERA11922
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court11921
+ Calcutta High Court11163
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court9316
+ Patna High Court9172
+ Supreme Court Of India7290
+ Rajasthan High Court7281
+ Gauhati High Court6711
+ Jharkhand High Court6569
+ Chhattisgarh High Court5684
+ SEBI5520
+ Orissa High Court3857
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission3722
+ National Green Tribunal3402
+ Manipur High Court3246
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission3090
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court2468
+ Armed Forces Tribunal2323
+ Uttarakhand High Court2168
+ Meghalaya High Court2128
+ Privy Council1731
+ Company Law Board1620
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST1334
+ Tripura High Court1203
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal1198
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction1155
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity1130
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal803
+ Competition Commission Of India672
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal607
+ Sikkim High Court460
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act408
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India380
+ Railway Claims Tribunal280
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal280
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board277
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board186
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority180
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange178
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal176
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India156
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST154
+ Authority For Advance Rulings137
+ Board of Revenue73
+ Commissioner (Appeals)73
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal68
+ Settlement Commission65
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property33
+ District Court22
+ Collector Appeals15
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission14
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs9
+ Trade Marks Registry8
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal3
+ AAR-GST1
+ First Appellate Authority1
+ Right to Information1
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Deputy Collector0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards393071
From 2011 To 2020284627
From 2001 To 201035820
From 1991 To 200015050
From 1981 To 19908123
From 1971 To 19804718
From 1961 To 19704996
From 1951 To 19604552
Before 19506901

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

.... Respondents 1 to 3 in the first appeal and Appellants 1 to 3 in the second appeal viz. Ivan E. John, Maurice L. John and Doris Marzano, grandsons and granddaughter of one A. John, are partners of the...outstanding against M/s John & Co. which exceeded Rs 20 lakhs. On February 5, 1948, the Collector, Agra, appointed Ivan E. John, Maurice L. John and Doris Marzano as custodians for running the mills...the defendants first set as also against the defendants second set.5. The case of the plaintiff was that Ivan E. John, Maurice L. John and Doris Marzano who were part...

..., their men and agents from interfering with A, A-1, L, O, N, C, D portions of the suit schedule property.(b) For possession of the property identified...as A-1, B, M, N, O, L portions and also N, N-1, O, O-1 at Annexure A to the plaint of the suit schedule property.(c) Such other relief/reliefs that this...that the plaintiffs are the owners of A-1, B, M, N, N-1, O-1, O, L of the suit schedule property.”6. The Principal Civil Judge, Shimoga, by his judgment and order...

...APPEAL NOS. 7207-7208/2008 Pharez John Abraham (Dead) By Lrs. …Appellants Versus Arul Jothi Sivasubramaniam K. & others …Respondents.... 2. The facts leading to the present appeals in nutshell are as under: That one John D. Abraham is the propositus. That original defendant no.1 is the wife of the said...John D. Abraham. Original defendant no.2, defendant no.3, one Triza Kalyani John (wife of 1 original plaintiff no...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

....(Paras 37 and 38)John Vallamattom v. Union of India, (2003) 6 SCC 611; Git..., (1981) 4 SCC 335 : 1981 SCC (L&S) 599; MCD v. Female Workers (Muster Roll...), (2000) 3 SCC 224 : 2000 SCC (L&S) 331...

...Building, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa (Since Deceased) Through his L.Rsi :Amendment carried out as per Order l (a) Steve John Mascarenhas ofthis Hon'blc Court dated 28.09.07 residing at Mascarcnhas passed in ChlA....\ln. 43 9/07. Building, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa. l (b) Malaika Viegas Wil'c of Steven John Mascarenhas residing at Mascarenhas Building, Vascu-da-Gama, Goa. l (c) Stalin Mascarenhas residing at Mascarenhas...John Mascarenhas ofthis Hon'blc Court dated 28.09.07 residing at Mascarcnhas passed in ChlA .\ln. 43 9/07. Building, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa. l (b) Malaika Viegas Wil'c of Steven John Mascarenhas residing...

.... Ranganathan . . . . 4100 7. B. Lakshmanan . . . . 3600 8. D.C John alias Valampuri John.... Election Petition 1 of 1974 was filed by Shri R. Mohana Rangam and Election Petition 2 of 1974 by Shri v. Subrahmanyam. The petitioners prayed that the election of Shri D.C John be declared void and....5. The election of Shri John was assailed on the ground that on March 9, 1974, the date of the scrutiny of his nomination, he was less than 30 years' of age and as such, did not...

..., and John Kemp (1874) L R 5 P C A 221 Sir Barnes Peacock defined the doctrine thus:“Where it would be practically unjust to give a...3 A C 1218 approved the passage in Lindsay Petroleum Company v. Prosper Armstrong Hurd, Abram Farewell, and John Kemp (1874) L R 5 P C A 221 which we have extracted earlier.... McArthur (1968) LR 3 Ch A C 496, Watsoh v. Reid (1830) 39 E R Chan 91, and Emile Erlanger v. New Sombrero Phosphate Company (1878) L...

...law laid down by the Supreme Court. In fact the Full Bench of this court has taken the same view in Peter John v. Commissioner Of Income...-Tax, [1986] 157 ITR 711. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the decision of the Calcutta High Court in L. Madanlal (Aluminium) P. Ltd. v. ITO...

... REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 673 OF 2018 (PAR) BETWEEN: MR K J MATHEW S/O LATE THOMAS JOHN AGED.... BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY FOR SRI. BASAVARAJ GODACHI .,ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SMT K J ELSY D/O LATE THOMAS JOHN.... - 2 - 3. SRI K J JOSEPH S/O LATE THOMAS JOHN AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS LECTURER, MANASA GANGOTRI...

...-2008 got registered by Mahimaidoss (PW 8) stating that on 14-2-2008, John Bosco (since deceased), who was employed as the driver in his travel agency, along with one Madhan (since deceased), took a...a body was found which was identified as of John Bosco. During investigation, Sivashankar (A-1 therein) was apprehended and he confessed about committing the crime along with A-2 and A-3, the...appellants herein stating that they abducted John Bosco and his friend Madhan and taken them in the Maruti van being driven by John Bosco to one of the relatives of Accused 2 therein where they caused death...

...at Madras. The criminal appeal preferred by the appellant Ravindran @ John was registered as Criminal Appeal No. 1144 of 2003 while the appeal of Peter John was numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 14 of...accused were arrested on 23-12-2000. Peter John (co-accused) admitted that the plastic bag containing white colour powder had been given to him by his friend Hiralal (co-accused) and that he had handed...fails and is, therefore, dismissed.Criminal Appeal No. 1202 of 200516. The appellant in this appeal is Peter John whose complicity was disclosed...

...reconveyence. Shanmugam Pillai v. Annalakshmi Ammal, A. 1. R. (1950) F. C. 38, followed. John H. Kilmer v. British Columbia Orchard Lands Ltd.L.R.(1913) A. C. 319..., Devendra Prasad Sukul v. Surendra 1 477 Prasad Sukul, (1935) L. R. 63.... 8 of 1960. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated January 30, 1956, of the Madras High Court in Special L. Appeal No. 2174 of 1952. Bhawani Lal and...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...ordered to deliver 152 bales of yarn of 18 counts and Rs. 30671/- be awarded as damages. The John & Company and its three partners. Mr. Murice L. John, Mr. Ivan E. John and Mrs. Doris John Marzano...evidence does not disclose any contract between the appellant and Sethiya and Co. The contract of sale was with John and Co., not with Sethiya. The appellant cannot hold the latter liable unless he can...no obligation to the plaintiff to deliver the bales to him. They may or may not be liable for their alleged default to John and Co. under some other agreement, but they are under no liability to the...

...L. Municipalities — Bombay Municipal Corporation Act,, 1888 — Section 314 — Power to remove encroachments “without notice” — Held, not unreasonable in the context — Discretion conferred on the...Royappa v. State of T.N, (1974) 4 SCC 3 : 1974 SCC (L&S) 165...; Viteralli v. Seton, 3 L Ed 2d 1012, relied onThe Influence of Remedies on Rights (Current Legal Problems), 1953, Vol. (6); K.K Mathew : “The...

...Sir John Edge :- This is an appeal by the defendants. The Midnapur Zamindary Company, Limited, which will be hereafter referred to as The Midnapur Company, against a..., including Robert Watson and Co., has, so far as is material, been very fully and most carefully stated in the admirable judgment of the High Court of Sir John George Woodroffe and Hugh Walmsley, JJ...Zamindary Company v. Naresh Narain Roy 1922 P. C. 241-48 Cal. 460-48 I. A. 49-14 L. W. 265-30 M. L. T. 279. (P.C.). See also the cases referred to at page 116 of the commentary on the...

...(RR) to Roshan John. III. Opposite parties witness : N I L IV. Opposite parties documents : N I L Sd/- PRESIDENT [HON'BLE MR. Shri P.Sudhir] PRESIDENT [HON'BLE MRS. R.Sathi] MEMBER [H...realise the bank loan dues amounting to Rs. 43098/- from Roshan John d/o E. John. But any RR proceedings has not been initiated against the defaulters. Meanwhile the bank authorities decided to conduct...revenue recovery mela with the participation of RR officials on 15/07/2015. In the list given by the bank authorities the name of Smt. Roshan John is also included and hence notice has been sent to her...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...- actions, receipts, p a y i ~ ~ e n ~ s and d i sbur se~~ ie~~ t s of the Rev. John ~ a n i p b e l ~ (the re- spondent.), in, about, touching and c o ~ c e r..., purporting to be a11 account incurred by the said John ~ a ~ p b e l ~ for q u a l ~ f y ~ i ~ ~ a8 executor on the estate of the said testator, amounting t o the sun1...o n s ~ d e r ~ n ~ liiniself a~itl~orized by that h o i i o u ~ a ~ l e Court to take and state the same; and it did not appear to him that the said John Canipbell...