...://www.judis.nic.in http://www.judis.nic.in G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J. Ravichandran, The Tahsildar, Thiruporur Taluk, Thiruporur 603 103, Kancheepuram District Cont.P.No.928 of 2021 13.08.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 11.12.2017 passed in WP.No.31990 of 2017 by this Court. http...://www.judis.nic.in 2. This court passed order dated 11.12.2017 in WP.No.31990 of 2017, thereby directed the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.06.2017 and pass...

...hearing, the learned http://www.judis.nic.in counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the main petition in H.M.O.P.No.63 of 2015 itself disposed of and hence the revision petition has.... Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 30.07.2021 Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order http://www.judis.nic.in 1.... The Judge, Family Court, Thiruvallur. 2. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madras High Court, Chennai. http://www.judis.nic.in G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. and C.M.P.No.5581 of 2018 30.07.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...collected sufficient materials, the offenses will be accordingly altered and all the accused persons will be http://www.judis.nic.in brought to book. 3. In view of the above...the above direction. 08.04.2021 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No http://www.judis.nic.in http://www.judis.nic.in M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. 1.The Commissioner of Police Chennai. 2.The Deputy Commissioner...of Police Anna Nagar, Chennai. 3.The Inspector of Police K-4 Anna Nagar Police Station Anna Nagar Chennai-40. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. http://www.judis.nic.in 08.04.2021 08.04.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...Ms.Chandini Pradeepkumar, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff would submit that the plaintiff would be willing to withdraw the http://www.judis.nic.in C.S.No.711 of 2015 suit.... 26.04.2021 Internet:Yes Index:No Non-Speaking http://www.judis.nic.in C.S.No.711 of 2015 List of witness and documents filed on the side of the plaintiff: List of witness and documents filed on the side...of the defendant: 26.04.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in C.S.No.711 of 2015 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. C.S.No.711 of 2015 A.Nos.5743, 5744 of 2015 and O.A.Nos.930 to 932 of 2015 http://www.judis.nic.in C.S.No.711 of 2015 26.04.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...************* [Judgment of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.] When the matter was taken up for hearing on 02.03.202, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and hence the matter was directed to be listed on 04.03.202 under the http://www.judis.nic.in 2Caption 'for dismissal''. On the subsequent hearings ie., on 04.03.202 and 09.03.202 also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and hence the matter was directed to be listed under the same caption and finally, the matter is listed today under the same caption. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2.In view of the same, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Civil Miscellaneous appeal for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is dismissed. [P.S.N.,J.] & [S.K.,J.] 25.03.202 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-9 pandemic..., shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant http://www.judis.nic.in 3concerned. .The Judge, Family Court, Madurai. 2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court..., Madurai. http://www.judis.nic.in 4PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA J. S.KANNAMMAL, J. JUDGMENT MADE IN C.M.A(MD)NO.056 OF 206 C.M.P(MD)No.9459 of 206 http://www.judis.nic.in 525.03.202 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

... http://www.judis.nic.in The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the first respondent to issue appropriate directions to the respondents 2 to 4 from using the name Ulaga Thamizh Panpattu Iyakkam or International Movement for Tamil Culture to any other non identical name. 2. Though the direction is sought for against the first respondent, the petitioner seeks further direction from the first respondent to restrain the respondents 2 to 4, who all are the Private Parties. However, regarding the usage of name, emblem etc., the parties are bound to establish their rights with reference to the documents and the evidences. 3. Unless the rights of the parties are crystallised, a direction in the matter of an injunction, cannot be granted. Thus, the petitioner has to establish their rights before the Competent Court of Law for issuing any directions against the respondents 2 to 4. 4. This being the factum, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the Competent Court of Law for the redressal of their grievances. http://www.judis.nic.in 5. With the abovesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 04-10-2021 Index : Yes/No. Internet : Yes/No. Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order. http://www.judis.nic.in The Registrar of Companies, No.35, First Floor, Ilango Nagar, Pondicherry 11. http://www.judis.nic.in S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. WP 1163 of 2016 04-10-2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...[Made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.] The petitioner challenges the impugned order of detention in Cr.M.P.No.8/Goonda/2021 dated 15.04.2021 detaining his son as Goonda, as contemplated under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. http://www.judis.nic.in The learned Additional Public Prosecutor reports that the order of detention passed against the detenu has been revoked by the Government by its order in G.O.Rt.No.2636, Home, Prohibition and Excise (XII) Department, dated 14.06.2021 and he has also produced a copy of the Government Order. Recording the same, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed. (P.N.P.,J.) (R.N.M.,J.) 28.09.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition & Excise (XVI) Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai 600 008. 2.The District Magistrate and District Collector, Tiruppur District. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District. 4.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Perumanallur Police Station, Tiruppur District. 6.The Joint Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Public, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai 9. 7.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai 600 104. http://www.judis.nic.in P.N.PRAKASH,J. R.N.MANJULA,J. 28.09.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...and http://www.judis.nic.in she is undergoing treatment in the first respondent hospital. To substantiate his submission, the learned Additional Government Pleader brought to the notice of this Court...concerned. 1.The Dean, Thanjavur Medical College and Hospital, Thanjavur District. http://www.judis.nic.in 2.The District Child Protection Officer, Department of Social Defense, Governmant Children Home..., Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 3.The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 4.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Vallm, Thanjavur. http://www.judis.nic.in http://www.judis.nic.in N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. 09.04.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) Though a slightly different version is presented to, in effect, challenge the delimitation exercise conducted in Puducherry, it is evident that the grievance pertains to certain voters' names being excluded from one ward and being included in another ward. __________ http://www.judis.nic.in 2. Ms.Mala, appearing for the Union Territory of Puducherry submits that the delimitation exercise was concluded in or about March, 2019. All objections were dealt with and were taken care of. Objections were invited and following certain objections, minor corrections were carried out. 3. It appears that the petitioner may have woken up slightly late to realise that the objection to the delimitation exercise can no longer be pursued. It is thus that the petitioner complains of defective or confusing voters' lists in ward Nos.III and I of Ambagarathur Village Panchayat. 4. W.P.No.21345 of 2021 is disposed of without any order. W.M.P.No. 22587 of 2021 is closed. There will be no order as to costs. (S.B., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.) 05.10.2021 Index : yes/no __________ http://www.judis.nic.in 1 The Chief Secretary Government of Puducherry Goubert Avenue Puducherry 605 001 2 The Secretary to Government Local Administration Secretariat Government of Puducherry No.16 Suffren Street Puducherry 605001 3 The Director Head of Department Local Administration Department No.16 Suffren street Puduchery 605 001 4 The Chairman Office of the Committee for Delimitation of Municipal...__________ http://www.judis.nic.in THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J. (tar) 05.10.2021 __________ http://www.judis.nic.in ...

... http://www.judis.nic.in The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to call for the records and to quash the proceedings in C.r.No.242 of 2017, on the file of the 1st respondent...possible. http://www.judis.nic.in 4.In view of the above, this Court directs the 1st respondent Police, to expedite the investigation in C.r.No.242 of 2017 and complete the same, within a period of...closed. 07.09.2021 Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No 1.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Team I, Chennai. 2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. http://www.judis.nic.in M.DHANDAPANI,J. 07.09.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that the third respondent will pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 31.08.2021 of the petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 2. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed by directing the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in accordance with law and on merits. The third respondent may also factor the order dated 26.09.2020 passed in favour of one P.Shanmugaraja who appears to be similarly placed person like the petitioner herein. No costs. 20.10.2021 Index: Yes/ No Internet : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking Order rgm/arb http://www.judis.nic.in 1.The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old COP Office Campus, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008. 3.The Director, Fire and Rescue Department, No.17, Rukmini Lakshmipathy Salai, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008. http://www.judis.nic.in C.SARAVANAN, J. rgm/arb 20.10.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...(The case has been heard through video conference) The writ petition has been filed for quashing the FIR No.29 of 2011, dated 29.08.2011, on the file of the Central Crime Branch, Tiruppur and to pay compensation of Rs.1 crore to the petitioner for initiating false criminal proceedings against the petitioner. 2. Mr.G.Thangavel, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that admittedly now in the above said criminal case, final http://www.judis.nic.in report has been filed, thereafter criminal trial was conducted in C.C.No.654 of 2017 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tiruppur and by judgment dated 30.11.2018, the petitioner was acquitted by the trial Court. The learned counsel would further contend that clearly a false case has been initiated against the petitioner and it is a malicious prosecution and therefore he is entitled for compensation. 3. If the petitioner considers it as a malicious prosecution, the remedy to the petitioner lies elsewhere and not under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty given to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings, if he is so adviced. Consequently the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 10.11.2021 1. The Secretary to Government Home Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2. Sub-Inspector of Police, Cyber...- 600008. 3. The Inspector of Police, CCB, Tiruppur. http://www.judis.nic.in V.BHARATHIDASAN, J. and W.M.P.No.2575 of 2020 10.11.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...(Heard through video conferencing) This Civil Revision Petition has been filed praying to set aside the decreetal order dated 11.01.2016 passed in E.A.No.109 of 2015 in O.S.No.169 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Villupuram. 2. There is no representation for the petitioners. 3. However, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the suit property has been delivered on 26.06.2015 during the execution proceedings taken and hence nothing survives in this matter. 4. As there is no representation for the petitioner and also by taking note of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent, this Civil Revision Petition is ordered as dismissed. No costs. Connected civil miscellaneous petitions in C.M.P.Nos.17768 & 17767 of 2016, are closed. 27.04.2021 Speaking/Non-speaking Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No http://www.judis.nic.in 1.The Principal Subordinate Court, Villupuram. 2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. R.N.MANJULA,J. http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.P.Nos.17768 & 17767 of 2016 27.04.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...Challenging the letter dated 21.04.2017 issued by the third respondent and consequently direct the third respondent to issue passport to the petitioner, the present writ petition came to be filed. 2.Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, the claim of the petitioner was considered and passport was issued to him and hence, nothing survives for adjudication. 3.In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 18.08.2021 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No http://www.judis.nic.in 1. The Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Inspector of Police, Mangalamedu, Perambalur. 3. The Regional Passport Officer, Thiruchirapalli, Municipal Water Tank Building, W.B.Road, Thiruchirapalli 620 008. http://www.judis.nic.in R.MAHADEVAN, J. 18.08.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...The present petition is filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.947 of 2013 on the file of the first respondent police. 2.Mr.S.Chandrasekar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent, on instructions, would submit that since the petitioner is mentally challenged, all further proceedings were dropped by the Inspector of Police, K.Pudur Police Station. 3.Recording the submission, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed. 05.03.2021 Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. http://www.judis.nic.in 1.The Inspector of Police, K.Pudur Police Station, Madurai District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. http://www.judis.nic.in R.HEMALATHA,J. 05.03.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...Through G-mail, the learned counsel for the petitioner has given a letter dated 22.09.2021 to the Joint Registrar (Writ) for listing this case for withdrawal. Thus, this case was listed under the caption for withdrawal today. Today, i.e. 29.09.2021, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition. http://www.judis.nic.in 2. Considering the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 29.09.2021 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No 1.The Superintending Engineer TNEB Production & Maintenance Mettur Dam-1, Mettur Division, Salem District. 2.The Assistant Engineer TNEB Distribution & Maintenance Omalur Post, Omalur Taluk, Salem District. 3.The Assistant Engineer-TNEB Distribution & Maintenance Omalur Town, Omalur Post, Omalur Taluk, Salem District. 4.The Chief Engineer TNEB Distribution & Maintenance Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Erode Zone, Erode 9. 5.The Deputy Chief Internal Audit Officer TNEB Pensions & Audit Brach, NPKR Building - 1st Floor, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. http://www.judis.nic.in C.SARAVANAN, J. 29.09.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner in the name of enquiry, based on the complaint given by the de facto complainant. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent would submit that based on the complaint given by the de facto complainant, petition enquiry is pending and the petitioner has to necessarily appear before the respondent/police for enquiry. 4.In view of the above, this petition is not maintainable by invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., and hence, this Court is not inclined to interfere with power of investigating officer. 5.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. http://www.judis.nic.in 20.07.2021 Internet: Yes/No 1.The Inspector of Police, R-5, Virugambakkam Police Station, Virugambakkam, Chennai 93. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. http://www.judis.nic.in P.VELMURUGAN, J. 20.07.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...Alleging non compliance of the order passed by this Court dated 10.03.2020 made in WMP(MD)No.2077/2020 in W.P(MD)No. 2431/20220, this contempt petition has been filed. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondent would state that the order of this Court is complied with and this contempt petition may be closed. 3.Recording the above submission, this contempt petition is closed. Consequently, Sub Application(MD)No.100 of 2020 is closed. Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No bala 25.03.2021 1)Thiru.Gnaneswaran, Superintending Engineer, Tuticorin Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd., Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Tuticorin. 2)Thiru.Vijaya Sankara Pandiyan, Executive Engineer, Tuticorin Town, Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd., Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Tuticorin. 3)Thiru.Anantha Raj, http://www.judis.nic.in Assistant Engineer, Distribution Urban/West, Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd., Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Tuticorin. http://www.judis.nic.in J.NISHA BANU, J. bala ORDER MADE IN DATED : 25.03.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondents. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), on instructions, submitted that no case has been registered as against the petitioners and as such, the petitioners are not required for any enquiry by the respondent Police. 4. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate http://www.judis.nic.in (crl. side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed. 08.10.2021 Index: Yes/No 1. The District Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur Road, Mayiladuthurai District, Pin: 609001. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Deputy Superintendent of Police office, Office at Near New Bus Stand, Velipalayam, Elancheran Nagar, Mayiladuthurai District, Pin: 609001. 3. The Inspector of Police, C-6 Manalmedu Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District, Pin: 609001. http://www.judis.nic.in M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. 08.10.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...

...When this matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioner has not produced the required documents and he also produced a copy of the proceedings of the Revenue Tahsildar, Ottapidaram in Na.Ka.Aa2/1911/2020, dated 11.02.2021. 2.In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to keep the writ petition pending and therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed. However, it is always open to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned with all supporting materials in regard to his grievances. No costs. Index : Yes/No 02.03.2021 Internet : Yes/No http://www.judis.nic.in 1. The Thasildar, Orthanadu Taluk, Thanjavur District. 2. The Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department/WRD, Grand Anicut Canal (GAC), Division No.2, Orathanadu Taluk, Thanajvur District. 3. The President, Kurambakulam Eri Pasanatharargal Sangam, Ambalapattu Therkku, (Regn No.SRG/Pattukkottai 33/2020, 636/2, Palayikudikkadu, Ambalapattu South, Orathanadu Taluk, Thanajvur District. http://www.judis.nic.in V.PARTHIBAN, J. 02.03.2021 http://www.judis.nic.in ...