Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

JAWON M. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DAVIDS, et al., Defendants.

JANE M. BECKERING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

JANE M. BECKERING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a Motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 59), and Plaintiff filed his own Motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 61). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on May 22, 2024 (ECF No. 73), recommending that this Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment, deny Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, dismiss Plaintiff's supplemental state law claims, and terminate this case. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly:

Service of the Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff was returned, marked “return to sender,” “attempted - not known,” and “unable to forward” (ECF No. 74). Plaintiff has failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 59) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 61) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's supplemental state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.

A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Martin v. Davids
(Jul 1, 2024)