AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

RICHARD FORTENBERRY, Plaintiff, v. TAMARA KELLEY, et al., Defendants.

F. KAY BEHM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KIMBERLY G. ALTMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MARCH 5, 2024 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 40)

F. KAY BEHM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Currently before the Court is Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman's Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 40). Magistrate Judge Altman recommends granting Defendants Maxson and Nakata's motion for summary judgment on the basis of failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and dismissing them as Defendants without prejudice. (ECF Nos. 40, 31). The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge's report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The court nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition. Therefore, the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 40), grants Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 31), and DISMISSES Defendants Maxson and Nakata as Defendants, without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Fortenberry v. Kelley
(Apr 4, 2024)