Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

City of New York, Appellant, v. Tri-Rail Construction, Inc. et al., Respondents.

Submitted by Aaron M. Bloom, for appellant.

Submitted by Connor W. Fallon, for respondents.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint denied.

The City has the general capacity to sue for the negligent destruction of its property (see General City Law § 20 [1]; New York City Charter § 394 [c]). Moreover, the provisions upon which defendants rely do not abrogate the City's claim for damage to its property (see generally Assured Guar. [UK] Ltd. v J.P. Morgan Inv. Mgt. Inc., 18 NY3d 341, 351 [2011]). Defendants have not established that the City lacks a cognizable common law claim.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, and defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint denied, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided October 17, 2019

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

City of New York v. Tri-Rail Constr. Inc.
(Oct 17, 2019)