Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

SUYDAM et al., Appellants, v. PITCHER&POOLE, Respondents

4 Cal. 280 SUYDAM et al., Appellants, v. PITCHER & POOLE, Respondents Supreme Court of California July, 1854

         Rehearing Granted 4 Cal. 280 at 281.

         Appeal from the Sixth Judicial District.

         JUDGES: Mr. Ch. J. Murray delivered the opinion of the Court, and Judges Heydenfeldt and Wells concurred.

         OPINION

          MURRAY, Judge

         Upon a re-argument, at this term, Mr. Ch. J. Murray delivered the following opinion:

         On the re-argument of this cause, our attention has been particularly directed to the 68th section of the Practice Act, under which the authority of the Court below is said to be exercised.

         After an examination of this section, we see no reason to change the opinion already given.

         An appearance by attorney, at common law and by the express letter of our statute, amounts to an acknowledgment or waiver of service.

         Such cases are not within the section referred to.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Suydam v. Pitcher & Poole
(Jul 1, 1854)