Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

ALVARADO et al. v. DE CELIS

54 Cal. 588 ALVARADO et al. v. DE CELIS No. 5,799 Supreme Court of California January, 1880

         Appeal from a judgment for defendant, in the Third District Court, City and County of San Francisco. McKee, J.

         JUDGES: Department No. 2, Thornton, J. Myrick, J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          THORNTON, Judge

         Department No. 1, by the Court (from the Bench):

         The appellant has failed, in almost every particular, to comply with the rules of this Court relating to the mode of preparing transcripts, and the transcript filed is subject to the further objection, at least equally important, that it is unintelligible .

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Alvarado v. De Celis
(Jan 1, 1880)