Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsyl v. nia, Petitioner

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 26 EAL 2014.

Prior report: Pa.Super., 83 A.3d 434.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.


AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED.

The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Was the evidence insufficient to prove endangering the welfare of children because defendant did not have direct contact with children?

(2) Assuming arguendo defendant could not endanger the welfare of children in his individual capacity, but as part of a general scheme placed a known sexual predator under his control in a position that promoted the risk of further sexual assaults, was the evidence sufficient to convict him as an accomplice?


The Petition for Leave to Reply to Respondent's Brief in Opposition is DENIED as moot.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Commonwealth v. Lynn
(May 8, 2014)