AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

DAVID A. WATTS and BARBARA I. WATTS, Plaintiffs, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE CORPORATON and DOES 1-50, Defendants,

Lucy H. Koh

KYRA A. KAZANTZIS (STATE BAR NO. 154612


JAMES F. ZAHRADKA (STATE BAR NO. 196822)


ANNETTE D. KIRKHAM (STATE BAR NO. 217958)


NADIA AZIZ (STATE BAR NO. 252966)


KATHERINE M. LEHE (STATE BAR NO. 273472)


FAIR HOUSING LAW PROJECT


LAW FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY


Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAVID and BARBARA WATTS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE BY 21 DAYS
As Modified by Court

Plaintiffs David and Barbara Watts and Defendants JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank, N.A. and California Reconveyance Corporation ("the Parties") submit this Joint Stipulation to Extend the Dispositive Motion deadline by twenty-one days. Plaintiffs are represented by Fair Housing Law Project of the Law Foundation of the Silicon Valley. Defendants are represented by Bryan Cave, LLP.

WHEREAS, the Parties have been diligent in their prosecution and defense of the claims asserted in this action.

WHEREAS, the Parties have not previously sought any extension of time or modification of the Court's Case Management Order.

WHEREAS, the Parties are engaged in informal settlement discussions to resolve this matter amicably, and the Parties agree that judicial economy and the interests of the Parties in avoiding unnecessary expenses would be best served and promoted by briefly extending the time required for the Parties to file their respective dispositive motions

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned Parties stipulate that the time for the Parties to file dispositive motions be extended by twenty-one days to July 6, 2012;

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned Parties stipulate that the hearings on any dispositive motions shall be continued twenty-one days to August 9, 2012,

Respectfully submitted,

FAIR HOUSING LAW PROJECT

____________________________


Annette D. Kirkham


Attorneys for Plaintiffs


BRYAN CAVE LLP

____________________________


Goli Mahdavi


Attorneys for Defendants, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA,


US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, and CALIFORNIA


RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION,


ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

I, Annette D, Kirkham, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 5, 2012, at San Jose, California.

____________________________


Annette D. Kirkham


[PROPOSED ORDER]

Pursuant to the Stipulation to Extend Time to File Dispositive Motions,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Parties shall have until july 5, 2012 to file dispositive motions

2. Dispositive motions shall be heard on August 9, 2012, at 1:30 p.m.

____________________________


Honorable
Lucy H. Koh


United States District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Watts v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
(Jun 11, 2012)