Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

COCHECO AQUEDUCT ASSOCIATION v. BOSTON MAINE R. R.

The form of action may be changed by amendment when justice requires it to be done; and the question of justice, so far as it is a question of fact, is determined at the trial term.

DOE, C. J.

The amendment may be allowed if justice requires it (Merrill v. Perkins, 59 N.H. 343, Elsher v. Hughes, 60 N.H. 469); and the question of justice, so far as it is a question of fact, is determinable at the trial term. Garvin v. Legery, 61 N.H. 153. It does not appear that an amendment will be useful. Whatever the form of action, the question will arise at a new trial whether there is evidence of any other wrong than a breach of contract on which no action can be maintained.

Case discharged.

CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ASSOCIATION v. RAILROAD
(Dec 1, 1882)