Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

STATE vs. THOMAS W. TONKS.

Public Statutes R.I. cap. 87 enacts a license system for the sale of intoxicating liquors. This system, with its dependent provisions, was annulled by the constitutional amendment, Art. V. of April 7, A.D. 1886. Hence complaints under Pub. Stat. R.I. cap. 87, §§ 25, 26, cannot be sustained.

This was one of several complaints certified to this court with the preceding case.

PER CURIAM.

This is a complaint for violation of Pub. Stat. R.I. cap. 87, § 25, which prescribes the punishment for the offering to sell, selling, or suffering to be sold, certain intoxicating liquors therein named, in violation of the preceding sections of the chapter. The complaint was made June 23, 1886, and charges the offence as committed on that day. The case comes up on certificate from the Justice Court of the city of Providence, upon a question in regard to the constitutionality of said chapter and section.

It is contended that the chapter and section are in conflict with the fifth amendment to the Constitution, because the chapter enacts a license system and section 25 is a dependent part of it. We think the point is well taken. Section 25 is not a separate and independent provision, but a provision for the punishment of the violation of the preceding sections by which a license system is created. It is subsidiary to the system, and inasmuch as the system cannot exist consistently with the fifth amendment, any provision which is subsidiary to it must fall with it, since the license and prohibitory parts of the sections are so interwoven that they cannot be separated.

Printed ante, p. 384.

The same is true of complaints brought under section 26.

Complaints under either of these sections must, therefore, be quashed.

Order accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. TONKS
(Jul 26, 1886)