Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

C. B. JUSTICE v. THE CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY.

Appeal — Assignment of Errors.

Where no errors are assigned, and none appear upon the face of the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

( Lytle v. Lytle, 94 N.C. 523; cited and approved).

DAVIS, J.

The defendant appellee moves the Court to affirm the judgment rendered in the Court below, upon the ground that no exceptions were taken and no errors assigned for consideration and review by this Court.

No errors are pointed out or assigned in the record, and upon a careful examination we can find none.

We call the attention of the profession to the suggestion of MERRIMON, Judge, in the case of Lutle v. Lytle, 94 N.C. 523, in regard to appeals, and to rule 7, to be found in 92 N.C. 847.

In this case the judgment below must be affirmed. Let this be certified.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JUSTICE v. THE RAILROAD
(Feb 1, 1887)