Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

In the Matter of the Application for the Issuance of a Subpoena Duces Tecum to FREDERICK STRAUSS, Respondent, to Testify. CLARENCE H. VENNER, Appellant.

BARTLETT, J.

We are of opinion that the order of the District Court of Arapahoe county, Colorado, of November 21st, 1898, revoking, vacating and setting aside the dedimus potestatem, or commission of March 26th, 1898, has rendered the questions presented by this appeal purely abstract, and consequently of such a character as will not be considered by this court. It follows that the motion to dismiss the appeal should be granted.

The usual question of costs below is not presented in this case by appellants, as respondent offers to enter into a stipulation waiving costs heretofore obtained against the appellants, and allowing the judgment for costs to be marked satisfied of record.

BARTLETT, J.

Motion to dismiss appeal is granted, without costs to either party as against the other, upon the execution of a stipulation by respondent in accordance with this memorandum.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF STRAUSS
(Jan 10, 1899)