Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

D.W. TAYLOR, Respondent, v. N.H. LAURIDSON and E.E. BARRY, Respondents;SACRAMENTO ROCHDALE COMPANY (a Co-operati

THE COURT.

The questions involved herein are substantially the same as those in the case of Willis v. Lauridson, ante, p. 106, [118 P. 529], this day decided. For the reasons therein given the order appealed from is reversed, with directions to the trial court to grant defendants' motion to vacate the injunction.

Rehearing denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TAYLOR v. LAURIDSON
(Oct 9, 1911)