Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

PECK v. STEPHENS et al.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Case-Made — Failure to File. The case-made, or a copy thereof, not having been filed with the papers in the case in the court below, is a nullity, and cannot be considered in this court for the purpose of reviewing matters complained of in the trial court.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

DUNN, J.

The sufficiency of the purported case-made in the above-entitled proceeding in error, to support the petition in error, is challenged in a motion to dismiss on the ground, among others, that neither the case-made nor a certified copy thereof was filed in the office of the clerk of the district court. The order from which the appeal was sought to be taken was rendered on the 1st day of April, 1912.

The motion must be sustained; the rule being that the case-made, or a copy thereof, must be filed with the papers in the case in the court below, or it is a nullity, and cannot be considered in this court for the purpose of reviewing matters complained of in the trial court. See Abbott v. Rodgers, ante, 128 P. 908, and cases cited therein.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PECK v. STEPHENS ET AL
(Feb 11, 1913)