Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

DAVIS v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al.

(Syllabus.)

Master and Servant — Workmen's Compensation — Appeal — Time for Filing Brief.

Where plaintiff fails to serve and file his brief within the time required by rule 5 ( 47 Okla. 5), (75 Okla. VI) governing appeals from the State Industrial Commission, or within any extension of time granted by this court, the appeal will be considered abandoned, and, upon motion, will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the State Industrial Commission entered on February 26, 1917, discontinuing the weekly compensation theretofore allowed plaintiff for injuries received while in the employ of the Independent Gin Company, of Nelly, Okla. The case was submitted to this court on May 8, 1917, but no briefs have yet been filed by plaintiff. Rule 5 (47 Okla. v) of this court requires that plaintiff file his brief within 20 days after answer of defendant is filed. It clearly appears that the appeal has been abandoned, and the motion of defendants to dismiss for failure to file brief is therefore sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAVIS v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION
(Apr 23, 1918)