Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

PRESSY JAMES v. STATE.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Pressy James, was convicted at the June, 1918, term of the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearances made for oral argument. The Assistant Attorney General has imposed a motion to affirm the judgment of the trial court on the ground that the appeal has been abandoned. A careful examination of the record discloses no fundamental error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiff in error. It also appears that the appeal is without merit and has been abandoned. The motion of the Attorney General to affirm for failure to prosecute is therefore sustained. The judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JAMES v. STATE
(Aug 14, 1920)