Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHARLES BRAMBIR and Another, Appellants, v. HARRY SEIFERT, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We cannot assume that the 1924 amendment of section 1425 of the Civil Practice Act (added by Laws of 1921, chap. 199, as amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 514), providing for judgment for rent, was intended, contrary to well-established principles, to warrant the entry of judgment for rent against a tenant not personally served with the precept or who had not appeared in the proceeding.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, BIJUR, O'MALLEY and LEVY, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRAMBIR v. SEIFERT
(Jun 26, 1926)