Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. James S. Verner, for appellant, cites: Existence of fiduciary relationship raises presumption of fraud: 61 S.C. 50; 110 S.C. 407. As to breach here: 13 Cyc., 704; 57 L.R.A., 458; 3 L.R.A., 836; 30 L.R.A., 214. Mr. C.T. Graydon, for respondent, cites: As to fraud: 19 S.C. 591; 64 S.C. 82; 93 S.C. 376; 90 S.C. 196; 96 S.C. 376; 110 S.C. 407. Cases distinguished: 110 S.C. 407; 61 S.C. 506.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. James S. Verner, for appellant, cites: Existence of fiduciary relationship raises presumption of fraud: 61 S.C. 50; 110 S.C. 407. As to breach here: 13 Cyc., 704; 57 L.R.A., 458; 3 L.R.A., 836; 30 L.R.A., 214. Mr. C.T. Graydon, for respondent, cites: As to fraud: 19 S.C. 591; 64 S.C. 82; 93 S.C. 376; 90 S.C. 196; 96 S.C. 376; 110 S.C. 407. Cases distinguished: 110 S.C. 407; 61 S.C. 506.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

EARGLE v. EARGLE.

June 28, 1929. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN.

The Court is entirely satisfied with the decree of his Honor, Judge Mann, and, for the reasons stated by him, the decree is affirmed and made the judgment of this Court.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS, and MESSRS. JUSTICES BLEASE, STABLER, and CARTER concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

EARGLE v. EARGLE
(Jun 28, 1929)