Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

LAWRENCE REED v. LAVENDER BROTHERS ET AL.

Master and Servant F i —

An award of the Industrial Commission is conclusive and binding as to all questions of fact when supported by sufficient, competent evidence, N.C. Code, 8081 (ppp), and neither the Supreme Court nor the Superior Court can consider the evidence for the purpose of determining the facts on appeal.

Proceeding under Workmen's Compensation Act to determine liability of defendants to dependents or next of kin of Lawrence Reed, deceased employee.

From an award by the hearing commissioner, which was adopted and approved by the full Commission, and affirmed on appeal to the Superior Court, the defendants again appeal.

PER CURIAM.

The award was properly entered upon the facts found by the hearing commissioner, later adopted and approved by the full Commission, as they are amply supported by the evidence.

It is well settled that the award of the Industrial Commission is "conclusive and binding as to all questions of fact," if supported by sufficient competent evidence. N.C. Code, sec. 8081 (ppp); Clark v. Woolen Mills, 204 N.C. 529, 168 S.E. 816; Massey v. Board of Education, 204 N.C. 193, 167 S.E. 695; Kenan v. Motor Co., 203 N.C. 108, 164 S.E. 729. Indeed, neither this Court nor the Superior Court, on appeal from an award of the Industrial Commission, can consider the evidence and determine therefrom what the facts are. This is a matter exclusively for the Industrial Commission. Ussery v. Cotton Mills, 201 N.C. 688, 161 S.E. 307.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REED v. LAVENDER BROS
(Feb 1, 1934)