Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Sprague v. Zeck, Appellant, et al.

Argued September 28, 1937.

PER CURIAM, November 12, 1937:

We are of one mind that the evidence in this record demonstrates that the questions of negligence and contributory negligence were for the jury. Nothing would he gained by a detailed recital of the facts, as that is all the motion for judgment n. o. v. calls for.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SPRAGUE v. ZECK, ET AL
(Nov 12, 1937)