Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of CHARLES H. STOWELL, Appellant, against BATTISTA SANTORO et al., Constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mamaroneck, et al., Respondents.

Per Curiam.

The record shows that the village trustees voted that the petitioner was guilty of the acts alleged only by the first charge. This charge was not considered at the Appellate Division. It was there held that the evidence amply sustained the other charges. The record, however, does not show that any action was taken by the trustees on those charges.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division for further consideration and disposition in accordance with this opinion, without costs.

CRANE, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ., concur; LEHMAN, J., taking no part.

Ordered accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF STOWELL v. SANTORO
(Oct 11, 1938)