Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

BAILEY v. STATE.

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General, Bailey v. State, 193 So. 873, the former opinion in this case is withdrawn, the submission set aside and certiorari granted to send up a corrected record. The return to the certiorari discloses a nol pros as to the second count of the indictment, leaving one count of the indictment charging the defendant with miscegenation, and judgment of conviction thereon.

239 Ala. 2.

And now, in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General, Granston Rogers v. State, 193 So. 872 and Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General, Bailey v. State, 193 So. 873,fn1 the former opinion in this case is withdrawn and the judgment is affirmed.

239 Ala. 1.

Affirmed.

NOTE. The foregoing opinion was prepared by the late Judge SAMFORD. Since his untimely death, this court has considered this case en banc. We are clear to the conclusion that said opinion is correct in all things; therefore, it is hereby approved and is made and adopted as the opinion of this court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BAILEY v. STATE
(Feb 13, 1940)