Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
  • Messrs. John M. Daniel, Attorney General, Claude K. Wingate and Henry R. Sims, for appellants, cite: Defining of terms by Legislature: 294 U.S. 87; 79 L.Ed., 780; 114 S.W.2d 796; 14 F.2d 564; 248 P., 1017; 141 N.E., 551; 112 A., 385; 232 P., 569; 239 P., 1022; 133 N.E., 399; 136 A., 223; 242 P., 49. As to avoidance of an evasion: 281 U.S. 497; 278 U.S. 470; 283 U.S. 15; 218 U.S. 57; 247 U.S. 138; 201 U.S. 633; 19 F.2d 260; 272 U.S. 365; 248 U.S. 297; 248 U.S. 498; 226 U.S. 192; 127 U.S. 678; 187 U.S. 606; 211 U.S. 31; 251 U.S. 264; 253 U.S. 350; 265 U.S. 545; 272 U.S. 581; 259 U.S. 503. Classification: 63 S.C. 425; 41 S.E., 521; 113 U.S. 27; 63 S.C. 169; 41 S.E., 108; 141 S.C. 407; 139 S.E., 834; 156 S.C. 299; 152 S.E., 865; 177 S.C. 427; 181 S.E., 481; 25 R.C.L., 297; 178 S.C. 57; 182 S.E., 96; 240 U.S. 342; 60 L.Ed., 679; L.R.A., 1917-A, 421; Ann. Cas., 1917-B, 455; 68 S.C. 339; 47 S.E., 695; 165 U.S. 1; 169 U.S. 366; 187 U.S. 606; 92 S.C. 14; 75 S.E., 374; 220 U.S. 61; 55 L.Ed., 369; 168 S.C. 440; 167 S.E., 674; 290 U.S. 169; 78 L.Ed., 247; 233 U.S. 389; 58 L.Ed., 1011; L.R.A., 1916-C, 1189; 147 S.C. 116; 144 S.E., 846; 37 C.J., 201; 17 R.C.L., 518; 92 S.C. 81; 75 S.E., 392; 62 S.C. 524; 40 S.E., 970; 74 S.C. 207; 54 S.E., 362; 86 S.C. 94; 67 S.E., 1070. Taxation: 134 U.S. 232; 33 L.Ed., 892; 286 U.S. 276; 76 L.Ed., 1102; 87 A.L.R., 374. Liability of principal employer: 141 A., 705; 173 S.E., 741; 139 S.E., 365; 3 S.E., 2d 290; 168 U.S. 85. Messrs. Edens Weinberg, for respondent, cite: Doubtful tax statutes to be construed against taxing power: 174 S.C. 359; 177 S.E., 653; 182 S.C. 72; 188 S.E., 508; 183 S.C. 38; 190 S.E., 249; 139 S.C. 107; 137 S.E., 211; 171 S.C. 441; 172 S.E., 432; 133 S.C. 383; 131 S.E., 37; 127 S.C. 473; 121 S.E., 377; 187 So., 880; 301 U.S. 584; 81 L.Ed., 1279; 109 A.L.R., 1293; 301 U.S. 619; 81 L.Ed., 1307; 109 A.L.R., 1319. Construction of statutes: 173 S.C. 149; 175 S.E., 213; 102 S.C. 483; 86 S.E., 1057; 154 S.C. 55; 151 S.E., 218; 166 S.C. 117; 164 S.E., 588; 286 U.S. 472; 76 L.Ed., 1232; 83 S.C. 481; 65 S.E., 725; 135 S.C. 348; 132 S.E., 673.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
  • Messrs. John M. Daniel, Attorney General, Claude K. Wingate and Henry R. Sims, for appellants, cite: Defining of terms by Legislature: 294 U.S. 87; 79 L.Ed., 780; 114 S.W.2d 796; 14 F.2d 564; 248 P., 1017; 141 N.E., 551; 112 A., 385; 232 P., 569; 239 P., 1022; 133 N.E., 399; 136 A., 223; 242 P., 49. As to avoidance of an evasion: 281 U.S. 497; 278 U.S. 470; 283 U.S. 15; 218 U.S. 57; 247 U.S. 138; 201 U.S. 633; 19 F.2d 260; 272 U.S. 365; 248 U.S. 297; 248 U.S. 498; 226 U.S. 192; 127 U.S. 678; 187 U.S. 606; 211 U.S. 31; 251 U.S. 264; 253 U.S. 350; 265 U.S. 545; 272 U.S. 581; 259 U.S. 503. Classification: 63 S.C. 425; 41 S.E., 521; 113 U.S. 27; 63 S.C. 169; 41 S.E., 108; 141 S.C. 407; 139 S.E., 834; 156 S.C. 299; 152 S.E., 865; 177 S.C. 427; 181 S.E., 481; 25 R.C.L., 297; 178 S.C. 57; 182 S.E., 96; 240 U.S. 342; 60 L.Ed., 679; L.R.A., 1917-A, 421; Ann. Cas., 1917-B, 455; 68 S.C. 339; 47 S.E., 695; 165 U.S. 1; 169 U.S. 366; 187 U.S. 606; 92 S.C. 14; 75 S.E., 374; 220 U.S. 61; 55 L.Ed., 369; 168 S.C. 440; 167 S.E., 674; 290 U.S. 169; 78 L.Ed., 247; 233 U.S. 389; 58 L.Ed., 1011; L.R.A., 1916-C, 1189; 147 S.C. 116; 144 S.E., 846; 37 C.J., 201; 17 R.C.L., 518; 92 S.C. 81; 75 S.E., 392; 62 S.C. 524; 40 S.E., 970; 74 S.C. 207; 54 S.E., 362; 86 S.C. 94; 67 S.E., 1070. Taxation: 134 U.S. 232; 33 L.Ed., 892; 286 U.S. 276; 76 L.Ed., 1102; 87 A.L.R., 374. Liability of principal employer: 141 A., 705; 173 S.E., 741; 139 S.E., 365; 3 S.E., 2d 290; 168 U.S. 85. Messrs. Edens Weinberg, for respondent, cite: Doubtful tax statutes to be construed against taxing power: 174 S.C. 359; 177 S.E., 653; 182 S.C. 72; 188 S.E., 508; 183 S.C. 38; 190 S.E., 249; 139 S.C. 107; 137 S.E., 211; 171 S.C. 441; 172 S.E., 432; 133 S.C. 383; 131 S.E., 37; 127 S.C. 473; 121 S.E., 377; 187 So., 880; 301 U.S. 584; 81 L.Ed., 1279; 109 A.L.R., 1293; 301 U.S. 619; 81 L.Ed., 1307; 109 A.L.R., 1319. Construction of statutes: 173 S.C. 149; 175 S.E., 213; 102 S.C. 483; 86 S.E., 1057; 154 S.C. 55; 151 S.E., 218; 166 S.C. 117; 164 S.E., 588; 286 U.S. 472; 76 L.Ed., 1232; 83 S.C. 481; 65 S.E., 725; 135 S.C. 348; 132 S.E., 673.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

JACK ULMER, INC., v. DANIEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

March 28, 1940.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM.

The facts in this case are not in dispute and are succinctly and clearly stated by Judge Gaston in his order on Circuit, from which this appeal comes. His exposition of the statute, and conclusions of law therefrom, meet the approval of this Court and are adopted by it. Let it be reported.

The judgment of the Court below is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES CARTER and FISHBURNE and MESSRS. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICES J. HENRY JOHNSON and E. H. HENDERSON concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

JACK ULMER, INC., v. DANIEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(Mar 28, 1940)