Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

PATRICK J. DOOLEY, complainant-appellee, v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANYOF PENNSYLVANIA, a corporation, and BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIPCLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYEES, an unincorporatedassociation, defendants-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The decree under review is affirmed, for the reasons expressed by Vice-Chancellor Egan in his opinion reported in 130 N.J. Eq. 75.

In the opinion, however, the learned Vice-Chancellor discusses the question of the right of John J. Buckley, general chairman of the System Board of Adjustment of the Brotherhood and of the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, c., itself to represent the clerks as bargaining agent with the employer Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. This question we do not consider necessary to the determination of the case and we consequently express no opinion thereon.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOOLEY v. LEHIGH VALLEY R.R. CO
(Apr 23, 1942)