Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. S.J. Pokrass, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Morris D. Schwartz, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for
  • Mr. Charles B. Murray, Assistant United States Attorney, of Washington, D.C., with whom
  • Edward M. Curran, United States Attorney,
  • Bernard Margolius, Assistant United States Attorney, both of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for
Judges
  • Duncan Lawrence Groner
  • Henry White Edgerton
  • Thurman Wesley Arnold
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. S.J. Pokrass, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Morris D. Schwartz, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for
  • Mr. Charles B. Murray, Assistant United States Attorney, of Washington, D.C., with whom
  • Edward M. Curran, United States Attorney,
  • Bernard Margolius, Assistant United States Attorney, both of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for
Judges
  • Duncan Lawrence Groner
  • Henry White Edgerton
  • Thurman Wesley Arnold
See more information ...
Smart Summary

DEPINA v. UNITED STATES.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of theft and sentenced to imprisonment of 20 months to 5 years. Throughout the trial his counsel made no complaint of any ruling, action, or instruction of the court and took no exceptions. In our opinion there is nothing in the case which would justify us in departing from the rule that points not raised in the trial court will not be considered on appeal.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

DEPINA v. UNITED STATES
(Jun 4, 1943)