AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. RICHARD F. HARRISON et al., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies plaintiff's motion to appoint new commissioners of appraisal to ascertain compensation to be paid for the property taken, and grants defendants' cross motion that the case be referred back to the commissioners previously appointed for the taking of additional testimony and the filing of a supplementary report.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. HARRISON
(Jul 8, 1948)