Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

POYSER ET AL. v. WALKER.

DRAPER, J.

The appellee recovered a money judgment against the appellants, who prosecute this appeal. The appellants have filed in this court a brief which, in our opinion, makes an apparent or prima facie showing of reversible error. The appellee has filed nothing except a request for oral argument, which request was filed several months after the expiration of the time allowed for the filing thereof under Rule 2-21.

For the reasons stated in Meadows v. Hickman (1947), 225 Ind. 146, 73 N.E.2d 343, and Huffman v. Huffman (1947), 117 Ind. App. 601, 75 N.E.2d 172, and on the authority of those cases, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to sustain appellants' motion for new trial.

NOTE. — Reported in 94 N.E.2d 272.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

POYSER v. WALKER
(Sep 27, 1950)