Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE AMES.

Habeas corpus — Not available to review errors of court of competent jurisdiction — Adequate remedy afforded by appeal.

Per Curiam.

The remedy for review of errors or irregularities in the conduct of a criminal trial or sentence after conviction is by appeal and not by habeas corpus, where the committing court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the person. Ex parte Van Hagan, 25 Ohio St. 426; In re Whitmore, 137 Ohio St. 313, 29 N.E.2d 363; In re Burson, 152 Ohio St. 375, 89 N.E.2d 651.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MIDDLETON, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.

STEWART and TAFT, JJ., concur in the judgment for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion in In re Levenson, 154 Ohio St. 278.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE AMES
(Mar 28, 1951)