Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

CHINQUINA v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

HABEAS CORPUS — Evidence — Sufficiency of. The legal sufficiency of evidence to convict cannot be reviewed on habeas corpus. p. 659

HABEAS CORPUS — Guilt Or Innocence. Guilt or innocence cannot be reviewed on habeas corpus. p. 659

HABEAS CORPUS — Evidence — Perjured. The commission of perjury by witnesses cannot be reviewed on habeas corpus. p. 659

Decided May 16, 1951.

MARBURY, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an application for leave to appeal from a refusal of a writ of habeas corpus by Judge Manley of the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City. The applicant was tried and convicted in the Circuit Court for Prince George's County on a charge of theft of an automobile. He contends that he was illegally convicted because the arresting officers at one trial (apparently of someone else) testified before Judge France in Baltimore that they could not identify him as one of the men who got out of a stolen automobile, but, at petitioner's trial in Prince George's County, they did testify that he was one of those men. The legal sufficiency of the evidence, or the question of guilt or innocence, or the commission of perjury by witnesses, cannot be made a basis for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Copeland v. Wright, 188 Md. 666, 53 A.2d 653. Walker v. Wright, 189 Md. 290, 55 A.2d 484.

Application denied with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHINQUINA v. WARDEN
(May 16, 1951)