Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

LANCASTER v. STATE.

LAWSON, Justice.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review and revise the judgment of the Court of Appeals in the case of Sherman Lancaster v. State, Ala. App., 64 So.2d 109.

The Court of Appeals rendered no opinion in the case, simply writing upon the record "Affirmed (No. op.) Harwood, J."

We have held that in the absence of an opinion by the Court of Appeals, we had nothing to review. Counts v. State, 240 Ala. 530, 200 So. 113; Washington v. City of Birmingham, 256 Ala. 121, 53 So.2d 624.

It follows, therefore, that the writ must be denied.

Writ denied.

STAKELY, GOODWYN and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LANCASTER v. STATE
(Mar 26, 1953)