AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

MAX WIENER et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of WIENER REALTY Co., Landlords, Appellants, v. REGENT BRAND CLOTHES, INC., Tenant, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Examinations before trial in summary proceedings are contrary to the spirit and intent of the Legislature in providing the summary remedy ( Dubowsky v. Goldsmith, 202 A.D. 818).

The court had no jurisdiction to stay the summary proceedings before final order (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1446).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, motion denied and stay vacated.

SCHREIBER and HECHT, JJ., concur in Per Curiam memorandum; HOFSTADTER, J., concurs in result solely on ground that in the particular circumstances of this case it was an abuse of discretion to grant order for examination; I do not regard the Dubowsky case as persuasive, nor, of course, is it controlling — and in this view, in a proper case, the court would have jurisdiction to order an examination and, pending its completion, order a stay.

Order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WIENER v. REGENT BRAND CLOTHES
(Apr 23, 1953)