Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

BAUMGARTNER v. STATE OF INDIANA.

CRIMINAL LAW — Sodomy — Indictment and Affidavit — Sufficiency of. — An affidavit for sodomy which does not aver commission of alleged act "with mankind or beast" is insufficient and it was error to overrule a motion to quash the affidavit. p. 236.

FLANAGAN, J.

The charge is sodomy. Appellant contends that the affidavit is insufficient because it does not aver the commission of the alleged act "with mankind or beast," as the statute requires. Section 10-4221, Burns' 1942 Replacement. The Attorney General of Indiana has filed a brief in which he agrees with appellant, and states that he feels this constitutes reversible error.

We have examined the affidavit and the statute. We find the appellant and the Attorney General correct.

Judgment reversed, with instructions to sustain appellant's motion to quash the affidavit.

NOTE. — Reported in 111 N.E.2d 727.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BAUMGARTNER v. STATE
(Apr 24, 1953)