Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

ETHEL FEIN, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. BONETTI, One of the Partners Doing Business under the Name of MARIETTA BEAUTY SALON, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Defendants. REGAL BEAUTY SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

Judgment of Appellate Division and that of Trial Term reversed, with costs in all courts, and cross complaint dismissed upon the ground that there was no evidence that the dye in question contained any inherently dangerous or poisonous ingredients (see Karr v. Inecto, Inc., 247 N.Y. 360). No opinion.

Concur: LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FEIN v. BONETTI
(Jun 3, 1954)