Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

A.H. CARPENTER et al., Appellants, v. Wayne R. GLOCK et al., Appellees. A.H. CARPENTER et al., Appellants,

ORDER.

These consolidated cases have been heard and considered upon the extensive record and upon the briefs and oral arguments of counsel for the parties; and

It appearing that the decision of the trial judge is clearly set forth by him in his opinion-findings and conclusions; that his findings of fact in each case are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous; and that his conclusions of law are correctly drawn and based upon proper authority;

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment of the United States District Court in each case be affirmed upon the comprehensive findings, conclusions and opinion of Judge Ford. 184 F. Supp. 829.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARPENTER v. GLOCK
(Jan 13, 1961)