Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of BARBARA S. HOOPER, Appellant, v. JAMES M. POWER et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and PIERCE PALEY et al., Respondents.

Order affirmed, without costs. We hold that the signatures in the group containing 184 signatures were valid (see Matter of Di Crocco v. Power, 12 N.Y.2d 762, decided herewith) and that the signatures in the groups containing 220 and 156 signatures respectively were valid for the reasons stated in the majority opinion at the Appellate Division. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF HOOPER v. POWER
(Nov 1, 1962)