Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Burglary — Grand larceny of inhabited dwelling — Evidence — Searches and seizures.
Per Curiam.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, GRIFFITH, HERBERT and GIBSON, JJ., concur.