Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

Allison T. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Raymond W. ANDERSON.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction of appellant in the Delaware Superior Court on its own particular facts is not in conflict with Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964) or with Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), whether or not finally held retrospective in its application or with United States ex rel. Russo v. State of New Jersey, 351 F.2d 429 (3 Cir. 1965). In all other aspects the state trial was free from substantial error.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLIAMS v. ANDERSON
(Jun 1, 1966)