SKOWYSZ v. CITY OF VENTNOR, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

Mr. Martin L. Blatt argued the cause for appellants (
Blatt, Blatt Consalvo, attorneys). Mr. Phillip B. Robinson argued the cause pro se. Mr. Marvin D. Perskie argued the cause for respondents (
Perskie
Perskie, attorneys).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

Mr. Martin L. Blatt argued the cause for appellants (
Blatt, Blatt Consalvo, attorneys). Mr. Phillip B. Robinson argued the cause pro se. Mr. Marvin D. Perskie argued the cause for respondents (
Perskie
Perskie, attorneys).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

EDWARD SKOWYSZ AND EDWARD H. BENSON, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CITY OFVENTNOR, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MAYOR PHILLIP B. ROBINSON AND MEYER SEGAL,MATTHEW GALLAGHER, RODNEY S. KREISCHER, SAMUEL J. KLIGERMAN, JOHN R. BEST,THOMAS WHIMS AND CARL VALORE, SR., COUNCILMEN OF THE CITY OF VENTNOR,JOINTLY. SEVERALLY AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Horn in the Superior Court, 110 N.J. Super. 340 (Law Div. 1966).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.