Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

In the Matter of LEO W. CARUSO et al., Appellants, v. MICHAEL A. CASCIOLA et al., Respondents. In the Matter of RONALD D'ANGELO et al., Appellants,

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: Although it is true that several of the signatures herein were improperly validated by Special Term in that the notaries public or commissioners of deeds had not taken oaths of certain signatories (Election Law, § 135, subd. 2; see Matter of Helfand v. Meisser, 22 N.Y.2d 762), the remaining valid signatures were far in excess of the amount required for designation. Moreover, although the technical irregularity of failing to administer the oath is sufficient to invalidate a signature, it is not the type of defect which would warrant invalidating the entire petition even though a sufficient number of valid signatures remained ( Matter of Clum v. Holmes, 194 Misc. 863).

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and JUDGES BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CARUSO v. CASCIOLA
(Jun 16, 1970)