Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Herbert Klein argued the cause for appellant Krauszer's Vending, Inc. ( Messrs. Krieger and Klein, attorneys; Mr. William J. Pollinger on the brief). Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for respondent Arsenal Esso Station. ( Philip M. Lustbader, David Lustbader, a Professional Corporation, attorneys).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Herbert Klein argued the cause for appellant Krauszer's Vending, Inc. ( Messrs. Krieger and Klein, attorneys; Mr. William J. Pollinger on the brief). Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for respondent Arsenal Esso Station. ( Philip M. Lustbader, David Lustbader, a Professional Corporation, attorneys).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

BERTHA SCHRAMM AND GEORGE SCHRAMM, PLAINTIFFS'-RESPONDENTS, v. ARSENAL ESSOSTATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND KRAUSZER'S VENDING, INC.,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantally for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Schramm v. Arsenal Esso Station and Krauszer's Vending, Inc., reported at 124 N.J. Super. 135 (App.Div. 1973).

For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, HALL, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD — 6.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

SCHRAMM v. ARSENAL ESSO
(Nov 20, 1973)