AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DONALD AND IRIS KONRADY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MILLER, judge.

Defendant United States Fidelity Guaranty company appeals the judgment allowing plaintiffs Donald and Iris Konrady to "stack" uninsured motorist coverage provided under one policy covering the automobile in which they were guest passengers. we reverse.

This case was consolidated for trial and appeal purposes with Barbin v. USF G, 302 So.2d 631 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1974). We have this date handed down our opinion deciding that case.

For the reasons assigned in that opinion, the trial court judgment is reversed and set aside. It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that defendant United States Fidelity Guaranty Company have judgment dismissing plaintiffs' suit. Costs at trial and on appeal are taxed to plaintiffs.

Reversed and rendered.

WATSON, J., concurs for reasons assigned in No. 4688.

FRUGE, J., dissents and assigns written reasons and voted to grant a rehearing.

[7] FRUGE, Judge (dissenting).

For the reasons set forth in the companion suit herein, Charles and Betty Barbin v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, No. 4688 on the docket of this court, I respectfully dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KONRADY v. UNITED STATES FID. GUAR
(Dec 20, 1974)