AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

SALLY O. LAMSON, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, A FOREIGN INSURANCE CORPORATION, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs filed by able counsel. Although the evidence giving rise to the entry of the final judgment, based upon a jury verdict, here appealed was in conflict, those conflicts were resolved by the trier of the fact for whose collective judgment we may not substitute ours. We find no error of law as applied to those facts. Further, the excellent briefs of the parties reveal that each point here presented has been heretofore determined by decisions of this Court and of the Supreme Court of Florida. Nothing would be added to the jurisprudence of this State by again discussing those points here.

Dispositive of the primary point here presented is our recent opinion in Thompson v. Jacobs, et al., Fla.App. 1st 1975, 314 So.2d 797, 1975.

Appellant having failed to demonstrate prejudicial error, the final judgment appealed is

Affirmed.

RAWLS, C.J., and BOYER and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LAMSON v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH
(May 6, 1975)