AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEROME MURPHY, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered March 28, 1974, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, a class A-III felony. Defendant was charged with selling three bags of heroin to an undercover police officer. Upon his conviction after trial, he was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a minimum term of four years and a maximum term of his natural life (Penal Law, § 70.00, subds 2, 3). On this appeal, defendant questions the constitutionality of the sentencing provision of the Penal Law as it applies to him for he was barely 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the crime and a first felony offender (People v Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100, 119). He also argues that the summation of the Assistant District Attorney exceeded the bounds of fair comment and was prejudicial. We reject both contentions. As to the constitutional issue, we find People v Broadie (supra) decisive and controlling. Nor do we regard the comments of the prosecutor as constituting anything other than a response to issues raised by the defendant in his own summation. Even if they could be considered error, it was indeed harmless in view of the proof offered by the People (People v Crimmins, 38 N.Y.2d 407). Judgment affirmed. Koreman, P.J., Sweeney, Kane, Mahoney and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MURPHY
(Jul 8, 1976)