FRANKLIN ESTATES, INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Lawrence S. Berger argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Lasser, Lasser, Sarokin and Hochman, attorneys; Mr. Richard L. Zucker, on the brief). Mr. Roland A. Winter argued the cause for respondent.

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Lawrence S. Berger argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Lasser, Lasser, Sarokin and Hochman, attorneys; Mr. Richard L. Zucker, on the brief). Mr. Roland A. Winter argued the cause for respondent.

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

FRANKLIN ESTATES, INC., APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 142 N.J. Super. 179.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.