Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

PAM'S CARPET SERVICE, INC., Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Remanded for reconsideration.

PER CURIAM

It is clear that the reasoning of the referee's order in this case is based upon Republic Dev. Co., Inc. v. Emp. Div., 32 Or. App. 263, 574 P.2d 660 (1978). Subsequent to the entry of the referee's order the Supreme Court took Republic on review and, although affirming the result rejected our reasoning in that case. Republic Dev. Co., Inc. v. Emp. Div., 284 Or. 431, 587 P.2d 466 (1978).

We therefore remand for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court opinion.

Remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PAM'S CARPET SERVICE v. EMP. DIV
(Mar 12, 1979)