Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Estate of CHARLES M. SPARACIO, Also Known as SALVATORE M. SPARACIO, Deceased. MARY SPARACIO, Respondent; EILEEN MAROSHICK, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate.

We agree that the testamentary disposition in this instance was precatory rather than mandatory. The testator, knowledgeable in matters of legal drafting, chose to employ the classic words of precatory import — "wish and desire". Additionally, the substantive disposition is internally incongruous with a testamentary mandate; the ultimate distribution was not to daughter and friend "in equal shares" but "as in their mutual agreement they decide" — an apportionment impossible of judicial implementation.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SPARACIO
(May 3, 1979)